How a Series Can Live on Beyond its Critical High
Movie series, on
average, peak with the first film, both in critical reviews and at the American box office. So says a
recent study from NerdWallet, which looked at every major film series since 1964 to calculate their
average diminishing returns.
In
their analysis, NerdWallet averaged reviews and box-office data for 130 series,
which included 475 total films, including Pirates of the Caribbean, Alien and
Iron Man – you can find a full list on
their website. Critical reviews were collected from Rotten Tomatoes and box office revenue figures from Box Office Mojo. Box office revenue was adjusted for
inflation, so the success of older films like Jaws wasn’t discounted next to
newer box-office winners like Twilight.
If the
average series earns less and less from one sequel to the next, then why do we
keep on getting them?
For most
movie producers, this U.S. box office
problem is no matter. A sequel may not outperform its predecessor, but a sequel
still often does exceedingly well compared to its contemporaries. The Dark
Knight Rises, for example, earned $100 million less than the Dark Knight, but
it was still the second-highest earner in the U.S. and Canada in 2012.
Gains outside the
U.S. can more than make up for any losses, too. Pirates of the Caribbean, for
example, may have earned less and less after the second film in the U.S., but, in
international markets, each sequel has improved upon the last film.
Pirates of the Caribbean - Box Office Revenue (adjusted for inflation)
International
|
Domestic
|
|
The Curse of the Black
Pearl
|
$441,320,020
|
$413,295,000
|
Dead Man's Chest
|
$742,268,659
|
$527,367,500
|
At World's End
|
$734,214,689
|
$366,987,000
|
On Stranger Tides
|
$830,759,292
|
$244,208,500
|
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (soundtrack) (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
In any case, even if
a sequel busts, movie producers can still turn a profit. All they have to do is
ground their expectations – and therefore slash the budget of the next film in
half.
Let’s look at Jaws
for example. It may be the most famous film of all time, and its U.S. Box office revenue – adjusted to 2013 dollars
– is the seventh-highest of any
movie ever.
As you’d expect,
when its producers saw this success way back in 1975, they were elated. And so
they set out to work on another, Jaws 2, with a budget nearly three times that
of the original.
When it arrived in
1878, the critics fumed and the audience wasn’t quite there; the critics gave
it a 53% – quite a severe drop after the original earned a perfect rating of 100%.
Again, though, the decline of the Jaws series is all relative.
Jaws 2, compared to
the other films of 1978, was still a smash; it was the fourth top-grossing film
in the States that year.
And so, along came
Jaws 3-D five years later. The biggest difference, aside from even more
dismalreviews: the budget plummeted from Jaws 2’s astronomical $107 million, to
$42 million – less than half than half of its predecessor and just slightly
more than the original.
A sequel may not
have the same firepower as the original, but movie producers continue to make
significant profits. All they have to do is adjust their production budgets
with prudence.
About the Author
Author - Mike Anderson |
Mike Anderson is an analyst for NerdWallet, a personal finance company dedicated to helping the individual consumer make informed decisions with their wallet.
By
day, he helps readers save money. By night, he enjoys
reading the Great American Novel, going to concerts in his new home of San
Francisco and biking around Golden Gate Park.
0 comments:
Post a Comment